Re: SCons and Parts
Tim Jenness <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Aug 10, 2016, at 09:02 , Russel Winder <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 08:40 -0500, Jason Kenny wrote: >> >> 1) Use six to get Parts 3k compatible > > I (with support!) rejected using six since without the need to support > Python 2.6 future can be used instead. Future is much more lightweight > than six. > > I have to admit given the demise of Python 2 in 2020, I am all for > ditching Python 2 support entirely. People wanting to continue to use > Python 2 should be quite happy using an older version of SCons. > That would help a lot. I got bogged down in a lot of unicode subtleties in my attempt at python3 porting. About 2/3 of the tests pass but most of the failures are bytes/string issues. I’ve now had to work on other things. — Tim Jenness _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev