Re: Fwd: [Scons-users] Performance of version 2.5.0 vs 2.3.0 on Windows host dropped significantly

Will do.
I'm trying to fix buildbot.scons.org/timings  as since the switch from SVN
to mercurial the revision numbers change to sha hashs and screwed up the
display.
If Henrik's example provides a differing data point perhaps we can add it
(or some obfuscated version of) to benchmark suite.

-Bill

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:03 AM, William Blevins <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Bill,
>
> Here are the SConscripts. I'll try to look at them after the first.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 6:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [Scons-users] Performance of version 2.5.0 vs 2.3.0 on
> Windows host dropped significantly
> To: [email protected]
>
>
> Hello William,
>
> I am happy to provide the Scons files outside the mailing list so you
> understand how the project structure looks like. See attached zip.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Henrik
>
>
>
> William Blevins wrote:
>
>> Is your project source available? In order to try to minimize future
>> risk, it may be wise for the SCons team to add some diversity to the
>> sample builds for future profiles.
>>
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Henrik Maier
>
> --
> proconX Pty Ltd | www.proconX.com | +61-7-33763911 | Brisbane, Australia
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>

_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev