Re: scons -j
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEyG4CGudgw4P3T_w+n+LhAQTjy3FGUD39r7+eg+OxeYMoUN+A@mail.gmail.com> |
As far as I know the intent was that flags copied from make would behave the same where possible. So likely this is a bug. On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 1:17 PM, James Corey <[email protected]> wrote: > Could be an anti-feature if people type -j without a number when they > don't mean to... > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 9:22 AM, William Blevins <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Russel, > > > > Depends. If I remember correctly, '-j' with no options just means > unlimited > > jobs. I don't know how often that is actually useful. > > > > V/R, > > William > > > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Russel Winder <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> I see make can take no parameters to the -j option but SCons cannot. Is > >> this a bug to be fixed? I think it should be, but… > >> > >> -- > >> Russel. > >> > >> ============================================================ > ================= > >> Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: > >> sip:[email protected] > >> 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] > >> London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Scons-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Scons-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev