Re: Hg vs Git

Russel Winder <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:57:29 +0000

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 21:19 +0100, Saša Janiška wrote:
> […]
> 
> For immutability lovers I can only recommend: Fossil
> (http://fossil-scm.org/) - I use it for *all* my personal stuff, but
> for
> public projects it seems that Git won the battle (although I’m
> waiting
> that Fossil gets something ala git-hg bridge).
> 

Git won the race for market share due to GitHub and O'Reilly. Bazaar
died when Canonical pulled the plug on funding – and Launchpad never
really took off. Mercurial stayed in the race longer, but when
Atlassian bought BitBucket and pushed Git ahead of Mercurial, it
presented the death knell on further traction for Mercurial. GitLab is
just promoting that Git has won the race.

Fossil never really got going in the race.

Fossil retains the DVCS model where Git, Mercurial, and Bazaar really
moved to being centralized with permissive and localised behaviour. The
problem is that centralised is good for marketing and traction where
DVCS is good for development.

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:[email protected]
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: [email protected]
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)