Re: D tool development workflow

Russel Winder <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Apr 2017 06:33:45 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 09:23 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote:
> I think reporting bugs for one part of SCons in a different
> repository is
> not a good idea.

I do not disagree. But having the codebase on BitBucket and the issue
handler on Tigris is a dreadful set up in my view. If the issue handler
was on BitBucket life would be a lot easier. However, every time this
topic comes up we end up at "someone insists that the project cannot
survive without the entire history, and no-one can be bothered to dothe transfer" so nothing happens. 

Of course Tigris looks like it is going away by the look of the sign
saying "no more projects". If that happens and nothing is done, history
gets lost anyway.

I'd suggest opening up the issue tracker on the SCons repository on
BitBucket sooner rather than later.

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:[email protected]
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: [email protected]
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)