Re: Python 3 issue

Hi,
I've attached the test logs from before and after the pull request

Many Thanks
Richard

On 27 June 2017 at 23:55, RW <garlicbready-gM/[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> I've just submitted a pull request to allow for relative imports under
> python 3 for tools.
> There's also a test included as well.
>
> https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/pull-requests/486/added-
> support-for-relative-imports-within/diff
>
>
> On 26 June 2017 at 09:31, Russel Winder <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 10:53 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote:
>> > This change:
>> > https://bitbucket.org/bdbaddog/scons-russel-example/commits/48899a710
>> > f9afbec891307addd6ae5b9c08d53c9?at=master
>> >
>> > Will make it work in py2 and py3.
>> >
>> > Any reason we can't live with that?
>>
>> On reflection that probably seems like what I should have written in
>> the first place!
>>
>> Python 3 uses absolute imports with the . and .. exceptions. The
>> absolute_import __future__ makes Python 2 behave the same to give
>> consistency. Of course this only works if the parent package is
>> imported. In this context that will always be the case, so it should be
>> fine.
>>
>> I can definitely live with this as an idiom.
>>
>> I am now just embarrassed to have found this problem. :-)
>>
>> --
>> Russel.
>> ============================================================
>> =================
>> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip:
>> sip:[email protected]
>> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: [email protected]
>> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev