Re: SCons performance investigations

Simply put there are many more integrations with github than there are for
bitbucket.
Thus the drive to move there.
Also many developers already have github accounts but not bitbucket.
I don't see any value in staying on bitbucket if we're moving to git...

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Jason Kenny <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think this is two different things
>
> Github vs bitbucket
>
> Git vs hg
>
> I think a better argument is moving to git from hg. This is an easier
> argument to make than trying to change two things.
>
> Jason
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scons-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gaurav
> Juvekar
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 1:54 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] SCons performance investigations
>
> On 2017-07-27 21:27, Bill Deegan wrote:
>
> > Post 3.0 - Migrate to GitHub
>
> Do you have any major challenges that could affect this right now?
> Migrating to GitHub might bring in more contributors, since hg is a
> significant learning curve to newcomers. Does this involve migrating the
> bug tracker to GitHub issues also?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Gaurav Juvekar
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>

_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev