Re: [Scons-users] SCons 3.0, sconsign files and Py2 vs Py3.. how to handle sconsign imcompatabilities
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEyG4CHo2K5J=BtKvshm5ZPcQ8hshhMy1HKOrtqU5o-Aa9-tAQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Dirk, Switching to github right after 3.0, so if you can hold off on your pull request. I'm hoping to release in the next couple days then migrate to github. -Bill On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Dirk Baechle <[email protected]> wrote: > Bill, > > thanks for clarifying and it's fine with me to wait. Should I open the PR > still on Bitbucket/hg then, or is there already a plan for the switch to > Github right after v3.0? > > Regards, > > Dirk > > > > Am 11. September 2017 14:59:48 MESZ schrieb Bill Deegan < > bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>: >> >> Dirk, >> >> I'd rather push that change to 3.1 (The need for speed release). >> That'll also give us time for some betas with those changes. >> >> -Bill >> >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:43 AM, Dirk Baechle <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Bill, >>> >>> Am 10. September 2017 04:13:37 MESZ schrieb Bill Deegan < >>> bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>: >>> >Greetings, >>> > >>> >This is (I hope) the last issue gating 3.0 release. >>> > >>> >Thoughts? >>> > >>> >>> not about this issue, but can we try to get the "stubprocess.py" wrapper >>> from Parts integrated for v3.0? I'm working on this and will try to create >>> a PR tonight. Unless you think this feature is still "too hot" and would >>> need more testing first. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Dirk >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from my Android with K-9 Mail. >>> >> >> > -- > Sent from my Android with K-9 Mail. > _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev