Re: Clone effectiveness
Damien Hocking <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
We do this too. Most dlls and sos have a cloned environment. > On Sep 13, 2018, at 12:27 PM, Pierre-Luc Boily <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello! > > Just read on the forum : > > /Here's the caveat. > Don't make a gazillion Clone's they're not lightweight. > If you make 100, it won't kill you, if you make 1000's you may start seeing > memory and speed impacted./ > > Our project branch contains 800 sconscript files. From those 800, 300 are > for windows compilation, 500 are for unix compilation. > > We systematically create a clone of the environment at the beginning of > *each *sconscript. So, if I understand well, it might not be the best > approach. It would be better to do a Clone only when it is needed? > Reducing the number of clone could potentially speed up the creating of the > tree? > > Thx > > > > -- > Sent from: http://scons.1086193.n5.nabble.com/Users-f16930.html > _______________________________________________ > Scons-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users _______________________________________________ Scons-users mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users