Re: Clone effectiveness
Gary Oberbrunner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFChFyjLznF_b-Ejcq9Gx=KmC8HSRe28yX=vcOULAkxrRF+5Pw@mail.gmail.com> |
Most people use them in a sub-SConscript so they can make changes to the env in that script that don't propate up to the calling SConstruct. Not the only use case of course, but a popular one. -- Gary On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 8:15 AM Hua Yanghao <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Gary. > > In this case I think I am mostly using overrides, and only one env per > software image build. > > If we have overrides what are the scenarios that a Clone() of the env > is a must to have? > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:03 PM Gary Oberbrunner <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > No. It may create an override internally, if you pass some keyword args, > but that's not a clone. So you can call Object() thousands of times for > sure. > > > > -- Gary > > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 7:56 AM Hua Yanghao <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Is every call to "Object()" implicitly creates a clone of environment? > >> I seems like so just want to confirm. > >> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:20 PM Mats Wichmann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > On 09/13/2018 12:52 PM, Damien Hocking wrote: > >> > > We do this too. Most dlls and sos have a cloned environment. > >> > > >> > As I said earlier, we clone lots (>90% of our sconscripts contain a > >> > Clone() call), but the actual build time dwarfs the "process the > >> > SConscripts" phase (*) so I don't worry much about it. We're not > getting > >> > killed on memory; I can build easily enough in a 2gb > Vagrant-provisioned > >> > (Linux) image. So while I'd like to *know* the numbers, it's mostly > >> > curiosity. > >> > > >> > Maybe we can resurrect some of the benchmarking/timing code that > exists > >> > in the codebase now to get more info? > >> > > >> > * - recent build timings: > >> > Total build time: 360.533189 seconds (using scons -j4) > >> > Total SConscript file execution time: 14.785102 seconds > >> > > >> > 15 seconds is slow, but if I sped up the sconscript time by 50%, I'd > >> > still make no more than a 2% impact on the overall time. > >> > > >> > >> On Sep 13, 2018, at 12:27 PM, Pierre-Luc Boily < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> Hello! > >> > >> > >> > >> Just read on the forum : > >> > >> > >> > >> /Here's the caveat. > >> > >> Don't make a gazillion Clone's they're not lightweight. > >> > >> If you make 100, it won't kill you, if you make 1000's you may > start seeing > >> > >> memory and speed impacted./ > >> > >> > >> > >> Our project branch contains 800 sconscript files. From those 800, > 300 are > >> > >> for windows compilation, 500 are for unix compilation. > >> > >> > >> > >> We systematically create a clone of the environment at the > beginning of > >> > >> *each *sconscript. So, if I understand well, it might not be the > best > >> > >> approach. It would be better to do a Clone only when it is needed? > >> > >> Reducing the number of clone could potentially speed up the > creating of the > >> > >> tree? > >> > >> > >> > >> Thx > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Sent from: http://scons.1086193.n5.nabble.com/Users-f16930.html > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> > >> Scons-users mailing list > >> > >> [email protected] > >> > >> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users > >> > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > Scons-users mailing list > >> > > [email protected] > >> > > https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users > >> > > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Scons-users mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Scons-users mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users > > > > > > > > -- > > Gary > > _______________________________________________ > > Scons-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users > _______________________________________________ > Scons-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users > -- Gary _______________________________________________ Scons-users mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users