Re: Thoughts on changing datestamp format in docs/code and supporting overriding build date with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

Russel Winder <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Oct 2018 08:11:33 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.user
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Sat, 2018-10-13 at 23:17 -0400, Bill Deegan wrote:
> Please take a moment to review this PR.
> 
> "Allow to override build date with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH"
> https://github.com/SCons/scons/pull/3221
> 
> Besides allowing the shell environment variable SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH to
> override the datestamp embedded in the distribution package and the
> documents, it's also altering the datestamp format from:
> 
> From:
> %Y/%m/%d %H:%M:%S

Non-standard format.

> To:
> %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S

ISO 9601 alternative format, but not preferred.

> Thoughts?

Using ISO 8601 for dates is always a good idea.

> -Bill
> SCons Project Co-Manager
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
-- 
Russel.
===========================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk

_______________________________________________
Scons-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)