Re: (no subject)
Mats Wichmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/14/2018 01:09 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Sat, 2018-10-13 at 23:15 -0400, Bill Deegan wrote: >> Please take a moment to review this PR. >> >> "Allow to override build date with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH" >> https://github.com/SCons/scons/pull/3221 >> >> Besides allowing the shell environment variable SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH to >> override the datestamp embedded in the distribution package and the >> documents, it's also altering the datestamp format from: >> >> From: >> %Y/%m/%d %H:%M:%S > > Non-standard format. > >> To: >> %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S > > ISO 8601 alternative, but not preferred. > >> Thoughts? > > Using ISO 8601 for dates is always a good idea. python even has isodate methods for producing such (one for dates, one for datetimes, if I recall correctly) _______________________________________________ Scons-users mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users