scons cache in a CI scenario
Mats Wichmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Recent discussions about the scons cache, which I've never made use of in the project that brought me over here to scons, got me to thinking... A continuous integration setup could potentially benefit from the cache - if there was a way to share it appropriately. As far as I can see, a cache is a local entity - you give it a directory name, which could potentially be shared (NFS, etc.), but still depends on having a standard pathname. For builds in a CI system, instances of the builder are constantly spun up, used, and discarded, so you don't have persistence - in fact lack of persistence is usually considered a benefit, just like scons's own reproducible build concept of ignoring the shell environment. Our builders - there are a bunch, for several different target systems, do very similar things over and over typically with only very small changes - you submit a patch to our Gerrit instance, it kicks off a dozen builds, something goes wrong, you find the bug in one file and update the patch and the process starts again, beginning with re-provisioning the builders. But the similarity of most builds to others that have gone before seem like a profitable candidate for fetching unaffected build results from a cache. Any thoughts on how one could implement that, assuming I've not misunderstood what already exists? "Repository" is something different, right? It seems more oriented to sources, but the doc says it covers derived files as well. And looks like it also takes a "directory", rather than a more universal "URL". _______________________________________________ Scons-users mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users