Re: Scons none-deterministic behavior for incremental build

Bill, I meant to say "using scons to implement all the features you
would find in kbuild ..." is not as easy as it could be.
I fully agree scons is much easier to get right than makefile and
shell script (programming in shell scripts is harmful, if at all works
...).

Thanks again for your help. :-)

On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 3:33 PM Bill Deegan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'd disagree that for simple builds SCons is hard to get right.
> Getting make correct with all dependencies and flat across multiple directories is non-trivial.
> While doing the same (for simple build as you've stated) is trivial with SCons.
>
> Glad you've resolved your issue.
> -Bill
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 8:30 AM Hua Yanghao <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > I guess that's an implementation detail... cpython 3 doing something
>> > different than 2.7. there has never been any promise: "A set object is
>> > an unordered collection of distinct hashable objects."
>>
>> Indeed. But it is so easy to overlook it.
>> I still think if now dict() starts to track ordering, so should set() too.
>> Basically all iterables in python should track orders when they are
>> created and when new items are added.
>> But I guess this should be discussed in python community instead.
>>
>> Scons runs our production SW build since quite some time and I am
>> still very impressed by its power and flexibility.
>> I think there is room for people who doesn't want too much flexibility
>> to have something less flexible but more easy to get right, and yet
>> provides all the old age makefile based features. I am going through
>> company internal process to have the build system (plus the core
>> firmware infrastructure) open sourced as soon as possible ... but it
>> is going to take a while.
>>
>> Our build system build on top of scons merely using python as the
>> software configuration system, and from a single configuration factory
>> (e.g. a single python class) we are able to create dozens of SW
>> builds, each are different (across many different CPU architectures)
>> yet the common part is shared, and the final customized image is
>> created out of the same source code tree. (exactly like how Linux
>> builds with kbuild but now everything, the build system and the
>> configuration system, are all in the same language - python, there is
>> no need for another domain-specific-language to be invented for
>> build/config system).
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
_______________________________________________
Scons-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users