Re: Default() and Ignore() - seem a little awkward
Mats Wichmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/4/19 3:55 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > Could what you want to do be better achieved by not adding the examples in > your relevant SConscript if such target(s) aren't asked for? In theory. That's kind of what the use of Default implies - don't add them if they're not asked for, no? In practice there are some issues for this setup - e.g. the helpful dividing up of each area into multiple areas (src, test, sample), each with its own sconscript, makes that harder, since apparently a sconscript with no targets at all isn't benign. Also that there are so many examples to be excluded-but-not-removed that describing what to include/exclude would bloat something - command-line options, internal flags, etc. Could turn off lots easily, then how to turn one back on? That stuff is our problem, of course. _______________________________________________ Scons-users mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users