Re: SCons vs enscons
Saša Janiška <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon Jun 1 07:19:14 EDT 2020 Daniel Holth dholth at gmail.com wrote: Hello Daniel, I apologize for late repy - fist of all, I am following scons-users via gmane and didn't realize that it was not delivering messages since January. Then, by inspecting archives I did note your reply and then submitted request for scons' lists to be re-subscribed to new gmane.io and, finally, since yesterday, gmane is operational again, but this time using news.gmane.io address. > I wrote enscon. I copied it over to github recency. Here's part of what it > does for C extensions. It's not too complicated. Thank you! > You can use enscons like any other SCons extension, or you can use it as a > pep517 build system so that pip can invoke it through pyproject.toml. What would you recommend for my use-case? Would something change with SCons-4.0 relase in regard? Sincerely, Gour -- As a blazing fire turns firewood to ashes, O Arjuna, so does the fire of knowledge burn to ashes all reactions to material activities.