Re: SConsignFile(None) + Decider('MD5-timestamp')

trevor fitzsimmons <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.user
Message-ID <DM6PR19MB4232E9F358B21077EDD0DF7296430@DM6PR19MB4232.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
When not using SConsignFile(None), regardless of Decider, building from directories doesn't have the "infinite loop" of rebuilding like I'm trying to address, but building from each directory will cause a full rebuild once.

So, in the test case, building from test would cause a full build, and then trying to build from test/src would also cause a full rebuild.  After that, scons will detect everything as up-to-date, regardless of where you build from.

In practice, I don't really keep building alternately from 2 different directories.  What I'm really after is targets being correctly identified as up-to-date, regardless of the level at which the build is executed.

________________________________
From: Scons-users <[email protected]> on behalf of Bill Deegan <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 8:43 PM
To: SCons users mailing list <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Scons-users] SConsignFile(None) + Decider('MD5-timestamp')

If you don't use SConsignFile(None), then is this still an issue?
Any reason you want a per directory sconsignfile?

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:47 AM trevor fitzsimmons <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I've dug more into this issue, and have attached a proposed patch against scons-4.0.1.

The general idea is to pass the parent node to _build_dependency_map, to then correlate "children" to signatures the same way Node/__init__.py changed() does, rather than using bsources/etc.  This fixes the pathing issues, and should perform the same when building from the same directory repeatedly.

Can anyone verify the bug, or provide feedback on the proposed patch?

Should I open a bug report instead?

Thanks,
Trevor

________________________________
From: Scons-users <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of trevor fitzsimmons <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 11:52 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [Scons-users] SConsignFile(None) + Decider('MD5-timestamp')

Since scons-3.0.2 (through the current scons-4.0.1), using SConsignFile(None) in conjunction with Decider('MD5-timestamp') causes scons to rebuild targets when invoked from different directories in the source code hierarchy.

Attached is a simple example to illustrate the issue.  Building from test/src will cause an initial build as expecting.  Building again from test/src will do nothing, as expected, and report everything is up-to-date.  However, if you build from test, everything in test/src will be rebuilt, even though it is already up-to-date.  Building again from test will do nothing, as expected, and report everything is up-to-date.  Building from test/src will then cause another full rebuild, even though everything is up-to-date, and the cycle continues.

This has something to do with the dependency_map which was added in Node/FS.py in scons-3.0.2, but I do not know enough about the inner workings of scons to propose a fix.  FS.py changed_timestamp_then_content(self, target, prev_ni, node=None) calls prev_ni = self._get_previous_signatures(dependency_map).  Depending on the starting directory, self is either main.cpp or src/main.cpp, while the key in dependency_map is the other.

In our full code-base, it's quite usual to build in a subdirectory while changing code, to avoid waiting on a full build, so the current work-around is to not use Decider('MD5-timestamp').  It would be ideal to have a patch that could eventually be applied to scons, to fix the issue in a future version.

Thanks
_______________________________________________
Scons-users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users

_______________________________________________
Scons-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.