Re: Anyone depending on having per directory SConsign files

Marc Branchaud via Scons-users <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.user
Organization XipLink
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2020-11-25 1:50 p.m., Bill Deegan wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> We continue to prune old code and remove unused and deprecated logic to 
> make SCons easier to maintain.
> 
> We're wondering if anyone uses the per directory SConsign file which is 
> enabled by
> 
>     # Stores signatures in a separate .sconsign file
>     # in each directory.
>     SConsignFile(None)

Thanks for checking with the community!

We use SConsignFile(), but never with None.

		M.

> Please speak up now if you depend on this and explain your use case, 
> otherwise we're going to start the deprecation cycle  for this 
> functionality.
> 
> -Bill
> SCons Project Co-Manager
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
> 
_______________________________________________
Scons-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.