Re: SCons 4.2.0 test failures: test/option/option-v.py and test/Interactive/version.py
Mats Wichmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/1/21 1:06 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > The tests in just-released 4.2.0 are failing for me. The two test > regressions seem to be related to unexpected(?) date syntax. If I read > the regex correctly, it's expecting the date not to contain any commas > but for some reason it does. > > > 1031/1213 (85.00%) /usr/bin/python3.8 test/option/option-v.py > match_re: mismatch at line 1: > search re='^\tSCons: v\S+, [^,]*, by \S+ on \S+$' > line=' SCons: v4.2.0.fcdadeef19fe5fead09fa7544a27502be65312be, Sat, 31 Jul 2021 18:12:46 -0700, by bdbaddog on ProDog2020' > SCons by Steven Knight et al.: > SCons: v4.2.0.fcdadeef19fe5fead09fa7544a27502be65312be, Sat, 31 Jul 2021 18:12:46 -0700, by bdbaddog on ProDog2020 > SCons path: ['/tmp/portage/dev-util/scons-4.2.0/work/scons-4.2.0/SCons'] > Copyright (c) 2001 - 2021 The SCons Foundation > > > FAILED test of /tmp/portage/dev-util/scons-4.2.0/work/scons-4.2.0/scripts/scons.py > at line 49 of test/option/option-v.py > > I can confirm those failures here as well. There was something new in this area after a comment of mine about the times looking funny in some case - and yes, the comma after the day looks out of place. _______________________________________________ Scons-users mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users