Re: am I understand the tree properly?
Bill Deegan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEyG4CEGiu8LQd9Mf3Pe8amhR0SJi3QaO-16y3NdjZgZ7UWRug@mail.gmail.com> |
are you listing output/data/target_a.data as a target for whatever builder produces it? (I'm guessing not...) On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:17 PM daggs <[email protected]> wrote: > Greetngs Bill. > > thank you for the tips, I'll take them into account. > regardless Iv'e found my issue, figures it won't work right if you use > c&p... > > there is one thing I'm curious about, output/data/target_a.data is a > byproduct of the creation of output/.stages/h/target_a > so it is logical to output/.stages/g/target_a. > however if I run it on a clean tree, I get and error that the target isn't > found, ll output/.stages/g/target_a returns a mach and if I run it again, > it works. > is this behavior because it is an inplicit target? > > Thanks. > > Dagg > > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 15, 2021 at 2:25 AM > *From:* "Bill Deegan" <[email protected]> > *To:* "SCons users mailing list" <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [Scons-users] am I understand the tree properly? > if a file shows as a dependency via the tree, then it's parent should wait > for it to be ready. > > What do you mean by out of order? > Not the order you expect? > or is a dependency not being met and a builder being run before it's > sources are ready? > > You can use "--taskmastertrace=FILE" arg to scons to dump debug info on > the processing of the dependency tree. > But I'd be very surprised if there was a bug there. > > A common error is to put call a builder/Command() with target and source > arguments in the wrong order. > > Or is it that the file which isn't ready yet is one which is found via a > scanner (for example an included header file)? > > Also.. if you set a Dir() as a source, it will not be out of date if it's > contents change. > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 11:11 AM daggs <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I see, any tips on how to debug why the build is out of order? >> >> Dagg >> >> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 14, 2021 at 7:04 PM >> *From:* "Bill Deegan" <[email protected]> >> *To:* "SCons users mailing list" <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-users] am I understand the tree properly? >> You're making my eye's bleed with that.. ;) >> >> There's no guarantee of order. >> That said any target which is "ready" to build will be built when a build >> slot is available. >> ready = nothing builds it's sources, depends, or implicit dependencies, >> or all those three are already built(or not out of date) at that point in >> time. >> >> -Bill >> >> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 8:31 AM daggs <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> I'm trying to debug an dependency issue on my build and I want to be >>> sure I understand the deps tree properly, here is the tree: >>> +-target_a >>> +-output/.dummy_targets/target_a >>> +-output/.stages/a/target_a >>> +-output/.stages/b/target_a >>> +-output/.stages/c/target_a >>> +-output/.stages/d/target_a >>> +-output/.stages/e/target_a >>> | +-output/.stages/f/target_a >>> | | +-output/.stages/g/target_a >>> | | | +-output/.stages/h/target_a >>> | | | +-src/data_files.ini >>> | | +-output/data/target_a.data >>> | +-src/dbs/target_a/a.db >>> | +-src/dbs/target_a/b.db >>> +-output/db_daemon.run >>> +-scripts/start_db_daemon.sh >>> >>> so, as I understand it, scripts/start_db_daemon.sh, src/data_files.ini, >>> src/dbs/target_a/a.db and src/dbs/target_a/b.db >>> are the first targets to get handled, then output/db_daemon.run and >>> output/.stages/h/target_a. >>> next output/.stages/f/target_a, followed by output/.stages/f/target_a, >>> output/.stages/e/target_a and from there is it simple. >>> am I right? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Dagg >>> , >>> >>> , >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Scons-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users >> >> _______________________________________________ Scons-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users >> _______________________________________________ >> Scons-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users > > _______________________________________________ Scons-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users > _______________________________________________ > Scons-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users > _______________________________________________ Scons-users mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users