Re: am I understand the tree properly?

On 9/15/21 13:16, daggs wrote:
> Greetngs Bill.
> thank you for the tips, I'll take them into account.
> regardless Iv'e found my issue, figures it won't work right if you use 
> c&p...
> there is one thing I'm curious about, output/data/target_a.data is a 
> byproduct of the creation of output/.stages/h/target_a
> so it is logical to output/.stages/g/target_a.
> however if I run it on a clean tree, I get and error that the target 
> isn't found, ll output/.stages/g/target_a returns a mach and if I run it 
> again, it works.
> is this behavior because it is an inplicit target?
> Thanks.
> Dagg

it means there's a dependency SCons isn't recognizing.