Re: tagging files (RPM packaging)
Bill Deegan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEyG4CGYQWyxvEAGb8RUwx7wp1Un7v=_vd0oJdMgEPWeCSbbdQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Also: Which version of Python? Which version of SCons? Which OS and version are you running? Thanks, Bill On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 1:55 PM Bill Deegan <[email protected]> wrote: > Werner, > > Can you make a sample github repo with all the attributes you're trying to > use, and an example rpmspec file? > > That should provide enough information to make sure we fix the issue > you're running into. > > Thanks, > Bill > SCons Project Co-Manager > > On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 9:45 AM Mats Wichmann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 1/1/22 07:16, Werner Reisberger wrote: >> > The RPM packages I am trying to build with SCons require certain tags >> > but most of the tags does not work out of the box. >> > >> > E.g. The SCons man page proposes the following call to tag a file with >> > the DOC attribute: >> > >> > # marks file2.txt to be a documentation file >> > Tag('file2.txt', DOC) >> > >> > This does not work. I have to say >> > >> > Tag('file2.txt', DOC=' ') >> > >> > That's because the tag is defined as >> > >> > 'PACKAGING_DOC' : '%%doc %s', >> > >> > but DOC attributes in RPM spec files have the format >> > >> > %doc file_name >> > >> > It's different with the UNIX_ATTR tag where file mode and owner/group >> > have to be appended like >> > >> > %attr(644, root, adm) /etc/yp.conf >> > >> > The tag command for UNIX_ATTR in the SCons man page also doesn't work: >> > >> > # makes sure the built library will be installed with 644 file >> > access mode >> > Tag(Library('lib.c'), UNIX_ATTR="0o644") >> > >> > You need to follow the RPM specification >> > ( >> http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-anywhere-specifying-file-attributes.html >> ) >> > >> > >> > However the tagging test script on GitHub does it right. >> > >> > Like the DOC attribute the following tag definitions need to be fixed: >> > >> > 'PACKAGING_CONFIG' : '%%config %s', # => >> > '%%config' >> > 'PACKAGING_CONFIG_NOREPLACE' : '%%config(noreplace) %s', # => >> > '%%config(noreplace)' >> > 'PACKAGING_UNIX_ATTR' : '%%attr %s', # => >> > '%%attr(%s)' >> > 'PACKAGING_LANG_' : '%%lang(%s) %s', # => >> > '%%lang(%s)' >> > 'PACKAGING_X_RPM_VERIFY' : '%%verify %s', # => >> > '%%verify (%s)' ? >> > 'PACKAGING_X_RPM_DIR' : '%%dir %s', # => >> > '%%dir' >> > 'PACKAGING_X_RPM_DOCDIR' : '%%docdir %s', # => >> > '%%docdir' >> > 'PACKAGING_X_RPM_GHOST' : '%%ghost %s', } # => >> > '%%ghost' >> > >> > Unfortunately my python knowledge is rather basic but let me know how I >> > can help. >> >> Looks like this code hasn't been touched in a very long time (except for >> some fiddling of docstrings and newer Python syntax, it's largely >> unchanged since 2007) . One wonders if it's actually being used - you >> may be a trailblazer here! Not sure if the actual problem is the tag >> specifications or the tag "compiler" in the code, we should be able to >> figure it out though. Help could be as simple as providing a minimal >> SConscript that shows the problem. >> >> > >> > Happy 2022 and keep on going with your great work! >> > >> >> Thanks! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Scons-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users >> > _______________________________________________ Scons-users mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users