Re: Has anyone seen anything like this
Mats Wichmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/24/22 13:03, Olivier, Jeffrey V wrote: > I have tried such things in the past but haven't found them very > helpful. This is the only output related to daos_errno.h > > scons: rebuilding `install/include/daos_errno.h' because: > `src/include/daos_errno.h' is no longer a dependency > `src/include/daos_errno.h' is a new dependency > Install file: "src/include/daos_errno.h" as "install/include/daos_errno.h" > > There is nothing related to any other file that depends on this. As > for your other question, no, it's not a generated header file, just a > source file. In addition to what Bill said (check ordering consistency, since the build line is hashed and checked in rebuild determintion)... this is a known problem of the (entirely separate) explain code - it can falsely report this removed/added dep thing when that's not the reason for the rebuild at all. Since we don't have a reliable repro, I'm unsure if my stashed rework of the explain code actually fixes the problem - might hit you up on that front. It won't help your issue, explain getting confused is not why your build is misbehaving. For completeness of data, are you using variant directories in your build? _______________________________________________ Scons-users mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users