Re: Does remote caching open up any security vulnerabilities?

Bill Deegan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.user
Message-ID <CAEyG4CE93idns-C5B50PPSsxXHYZc9xqg9PBKNujCizFKvp9Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Don,

If you're seriously concerned (as in this is actually happening ever) about
malicious alteration of your cachedir in your development environment, then
you have lots of issues..
That's what I was referring to.

Nope. Remote caching definitely has been asked for and there's a PR with an
implementation as well.
But as yet not merged.
That predates the customizable cachedir implementation which dmoody
mentioned.

Indeed a SCons cachedir server, and plugins for (I think it's) meson's
cachedir server would be great additions.


-Bill

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 10:38 PM Don Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for the quick response Bill.  When you say we’ll have “lots of
> issues to contend with”, what exactly are you referring to?  Is Remote
> Caching generally thought to be more of a headache than it’s worth?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Don
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Scons-users <[email protected]> * On Behalf Of *Bill
> Deegan
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 22, 2022 12:15 PM
> *To:* SCons users mailing list <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-users] Does remote caching open up any security
> vulnerabilities?
>
>
>
> *WARNING:* This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary
> of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:03 PM Don Baldwin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> What precautions are in place to prevent someone from modifying a cached
> file to inject nefarious code into a product?
>
>
>
> Currently there are none.
>
> If you're building software in such an environment, you have lots of
> issues to contend with in addition to someone altering the cachedir files.
>
>
>
> Generally we don't check target file modification either (assuming nothing
> depends on a given target file as source to another builder).
>
> Though in that case it would just case a rebuild of the target which
> depends on it, not a specific notice that it had been modified.
>
>
>
> _Bill
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>

_______________________________________________
Scons-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.