Re: untar builder fails with error

> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2022 at 4:58 PM
> From: "Mats Wichmann" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Scons-users] untar builder fails with error
>
> On 11/8/22 07:45, daggs wrote:
> > you might have asked me, I don't remember, as for python virtualenv, I 
> > don't know what is it, I need to read about it.
> > Dagg
> > *Sent:* Monday, November 07, 2022 at 11:01 PM
> > *From:* "Bill Deegan" <[email protected]>
> > *To:* "SCons users mailing list" <[email protected]>
> > *Subject:* Re: [Scons-users] untar builder fails with error
> > creating a python virtualenv isn't possible for you?
> > (I feel like I've asked you this before?)
> > On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 3:29 AM daggs <[email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> It's really a two-part story.
> 
> *If* you can get an alternative Python installed, then you can build an 
> environment which runs scons using that Python - all that really means 
> is there's some location on your system where packages needed to run 
> some Python application are installed, isolated from your main system 
> Python and its package installation location.
> 
> The former isn't necessarily all that simple.  I've tended to use a 
> project called "pyenv", which automates setting it up - the Python will 
> also go into an alternate location so it doesn't interfere at all with 
> the system Python.
> 
> https://github.com/pyenv
> 
> There's a simple example of creating a virtualenv in the SCons cookbook, 
> but this wouldn't be quite what you want, since it uses the *system* 
> Python to seed the virtualenv, not an alternate one:
> 
> https://scons-cookbook.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#setting-up-a-python-virtualenv-for-scons
> 
> For this kind of purpose I've used a pyenv plugin, "pyenv-virtualenv". 
> A sequence might look something like this:
> 
> pyenv install --list   # see what's available (it's a *long* list)
> pyenv install 3.10.8
> pyenv virtualenv 3.10.8 myworkenv  # create the venv
> pyenv activate myworkenv
> etc ...
> 
> This is all great unless you're on Windows - the pyenv facilities are 
> built on the POSIX shell so they don't work on Windows, although now 
> there's an alternate implementation that works with Powershell, which I 
> have no experience with.
> 
> There's a bit to think about here, at this point, just know that such 
> facilities exist.

our build env is complex enough, this will add another layer of complexity which will be most probably rejected

Dagg
_______________________________________________
Scons-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users