Re: scons 'v fails

Bill Deegan <[email protected]> Wed, 6 Mar 2024 13:52:08 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.user
Message-ID <CAEyG4CEzUk8NcDjgqXQmRNJ=qMTB6BwUHOFBS27Yip6e-fHWZw@mail.gmail.com>
4.5.2 is a native package for the distort you're using?
Which Linux distro?

Have you tried diffing /usr/bin/scons on systems which work and systems
which don't work?
Something odd is going on.

On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 11:31 PM daggs <[email protected]> wrote:

> pkg mgr, other users on the system use the same version without any issues
>
> $ python -V
> Python 3.9.18
>
> >Sent: Monday, March 04, 2024 at 9:10 PM
> >From: "Bill Deegan" <[email protected]>
> >To: "SCons users mailing list" <[email protected]>
> >Cc: "daggs" <[email protected]>
> >Subject: Re: [Scons-users] scons 'v fails
> >
> >How did they install SCons?
> >(command line for install)
> >Which version of python?
> >
> >On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 8:32 AM daggs via Scons-users <
> [email protected][mailto:[email protected]]> wrote:> Sent:
> Monday, March 04, 2024 at 6:47 PM
> >> From: "Mats Wichmann" <[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]>
> >> To: [email protected][mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Subject: Re: [Scons-users] scons 'v fails
> >>
> >> On 3/4/24 08:25, daggs via Scons-users wrote:
> >> > Greetings,
> >> >
> >> > I've encountered a user on one of our systems where scons -v fails.
> >> > this is the output:
> >> > $ scons -v
> >> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >> >    File "/usr/bin/scons", line 33, in <module>
> >> >      sys.exit(load_entry_point('SCons==4.5.2', 'console_scripts',
> 'scons')())
> >> >    File "/usr/bin/scons", line 25, in importlib_load_entry_point
> >> >      return next(matches).load()
> >> > StopIteration
> >> >
> >> > any ideas what can cause it?
> >>
> >> That's weird.  I didn't think the entry_point magic even got invoked on
> >> Linux. Is there more information, like distro name/version? Have VMs
> >> here of various Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, Mint and Centos-like here where
> >> could crosscheck. It *could* be a packaging problem, though I don't want
> >> to point fingers elsewhere without more info.
> >>
> >
> >rhel 9.3, kernel 5.14.0-362.18.1.el9_3.x86_64
> >
> >any other info needed?
> >
>

_______________________________________________
Scons-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users