Re: scons 'v fails
Bill Deegan <[email protected]> Wed, 6 Mar 2024 13:52:08 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEyG4CEzUk8NcDjgqXQmRNJ=qMTB6BwUHOFBS27Yip6e-fHWZw@mail.gmail.com> |
4.5.2 is a native package for the distort you're using? Which Linux distro? Have you tried diffing /usr/bin/scons on systems which work and systems which don't work? Something odd is going on. On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 11:31 PM daggs <[email protected]> wrote: > pkg mgr, other users on the system use the same version without any issues > > $ python -V > Python 3.9.18 > > >Sent: Monday, March 04, 2024 at 9:10 PM > >From: "Bill Deegan" <[email protected]> > >To: "SCons users mailing list" <[email protected]> > >Cc: "daggs" <[email protected]> > >Subject: Re: [Scons-users] scons 'v fails > > > >How did they install SCons? > >(command line for install) > >Which version of python? > > > >On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 8:32 AM daggs via Scons-users < > [email protected][mailto:[email protected]]> wrote:> Sent: > Monday, March 04, 2024 at 6:47 PM > >> From: "Mats Wichmann" <[email protected][mailto:[email protected]]> > >> To: [email protected][mailto:[email protected]] > >> Subject: Re: [Scons-users] scons 'v fails > >> > >> On 3/4/24 08:25, daggs via Scons-users wrote: > >> > Greetings, > >> > > >> > I've encountered a user on one of our systems where scons -v fails. > >> > this is the output: > >> > $ scons -v > >> > Traceback (most recent call last): > >> > File "/usr/bin/scons", line 33, in <module> > >> > sys.exit(load_entry_point('SCons==4.5.2', 'console_scripts', > 'scons')()) > >> > File "/usr/bin/scons", line 25, in importlib_load_entry_point > >> > return next(matches).load() > >> > StopIteration > >> > > >> > any ideas what can cause it? > >> > >> That's weird. I didn't think the entry_point magic even got invoked on > >> Linux. Is there more information, like distro name/version? Have VMs > >> here of various Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, Mint and Centos-like here where > >> could crosscheck. It *could* be a packaging problem, though I don't want > >> to point fingers elsewhere without more info. > >> > > > >rhel 9.3, kernel 5.14.0-362.18.1.el9_3.x86_64 > > > >any other info needed? > > > _______________________________________________ Scons-users mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users