Re: SCons very slow on GitHub actions
Leonard de Ruijter <[email protected]> Mon, 28 Apr 2025 15:42:54 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Mats, Thanks for your quick reply. You can find comparison times in https://github.com/LeonarddeR/scons-examples/actions/runs/14706591575 This uses the workflow file found in https://github.com/SCons/scons-examples/pull/7 As you can see here, the Ubuntu and Mac runs take around 7 seconds, whereas the Windows runs take over a minute. The builds run with --debug=time, so you can see from the build steps that the reading part of the execution takes around 54 seconds. Regards, Leonard On 4/28/2025 3:33 PM, Mats Wichmann wrote: > On 4/28/25 06:03, Leonard de Ruijter wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm suffering from very slow SCons script reading times on Github >> Actions with Windows runners. For an example, see https://github.com/ >> LeonarddeR/scons-examples/actions/runs/14706591575/job/41268375471 >> >> Things I've tried so far to fix this are: >> - Pinned version of Python with the setup-python action, both X86 and >> X64 >> - Pinned version of SCons to an older version, e.g. 4.8.1 >> - Server 2025 image >> - Run in a venv with uv >> - Cleaning up the path variable, since it is known to be full of >> garbage on GH Actions >> - Using a Windows dev drive >> >> There's definitely a variable on Github Actions that kicks us here, >> but apart from the script reading phase, all seems pretty smooth >> afterwards. And not to mention that other runners are going fine. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Leonard de Ruijter > Hard to say too much at this point. How slow is it? Do you have a > comparison to, say, a Linux build? Are there a lot of files involved > in building the dependency tree? Do they result in a lot of work > (dependency scanning, etc.)? > > The contents of PATH shouldn't affect times since SCons ignores it. > Are you by any chance importing PATH in your build? > > SCons *is* slower on Windows. It's irritating to those of us who run > the test suite a lot, because where Windows is demonstrably slower is > in the plumbing of creating a new process. That hurts the test suite > because we do it over and over again - 1200+ tests run scons 1-3 times > each, and many of those have command actions which spawn further > processes, so it adds up. The GH Actions runs of our test suite take > 5:45 on Linux, 17m+ on Windows. However... that usually isn't a big > factor building a single project, and you'd see it in the build phase, > not in the reading phase. > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users