RE: Patch to DorothyLocker
"Garth T Kidd" <garth-OnzZ1s1DREKDegMON/[email protected]> Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:31:18 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.pythin.pyds.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Deadly Bloody Serious |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Okay; my first and most major blunder was that DorothyRLock wasn't thread-safe. What's left, after fixing that and a couple more bugs, is that the code to print details about foreign owners just isn't right. I'll fix it. What'll be left after *that* is a blockade on the Events tool. -----Original Message----- From: pyds-dev-admin-iYtK5bfT9M//Ad8WF/[email protected] [mailto:pyds-dev-admin-iYtK5bfT9M//Ad8WF/[email protected]] On Behalf Of Garth T Kidd Sent: Wednesday, 22 September 2004 11:18 AM To: 'Thomas Klaeger'; pyds-dev-iYtK5bfT9M//Ad8WF/[email protected] Subject: RE: [Pyds-dev] Patch to DorothyLocker I'll have to re-test. I can't incorporate the patches as-is because they're broken: Rlocks can be locked multiple times by the same thread, and your added lockContext attributes bypass my stack of lock details. -----Original Message----- From: pyds-dev-admin-iYtK5bfT9M//Ad8WF/[email protected] [mailto:pyds-dev-admin-iYtK5bfT9M//Ad8WF/[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thomas Klaeger Sent: Monday, 20 September 2004 8:41 PM To: pyds-dev-iYtK5bfT9M//Ad8WF/[email protected] Subject: [Pyds-dev] Patch to DorothyLocker DorothyLocker raised exceptions if a lock was held by another task. In this case the lockContext and lockTime was not defined although it should have been. Additionally it whined about unable to lock long after the lock had been acquired due to the LockWhiner not checking if it has been stopped before whining. _______________________________________________ Pyds-dev mailing list Pyds-dev-iYtK5bfT9M//Ad8WF/[email protected] http://www.westfalen.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pyds-dev