lock.acquire behaviour
"Thomas Klaeger" <[email protected]> Sun, 03 Oct 2004 11:59:44 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.pythin.pyds.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <415FE9B0.3144.345FE9@localhost> |
--Message-Boundary-27084
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-description: Mail message body
Hi!
To test the behaviour I wrote the attached unit tests.
My observations on win32: python 2.2.3 behaves as documented,
while python 2.3.4 does not behave as documented (the noargs test
will fail)
On Monday I will have the opportunity to test on SuSE Linux 9.0.
Could you post your observations on the systems available to you?
Regards, Thomas
--Message-Boundary-27084
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-description: Text from file 'LockTest.py'
import thread
import unittest
class LockTest(unittest.TestCase):
"""
Tests for thread.lock behaviour. See the documentation at
http://www.python.org/doc/2.2.3/lib/module-thread.html and
http://www.python.org/doc/2.3.4/lib/module-thread.html. Search
for acquire on the corresponding page.
test_noargs() will fail on win32 with python 2.3.4
"""
def test_noargs(self):
"According to the docs the following call should return None"
lock = thread.allocate_lock()
self.assertEquals(None, lock.acquire(), "lock.acquire does not behave as documented")
def test_nonblocking(self):
"According to the docs the following call should return True"
lock = thread.allocate_lock()
self.assert_(lock.acquire(0), "lock.acquire does not behave as documented")
def test_blocking(self):
"According to the docs the following call should return True"
lock = thread.allocate_lock()
self.assert_(lock.acquire(1), "lock.acquire does not behave as documented")
if __name__ == '__main__':
# Run the tests.
unittest.main()
--Message-Boundary-27084--