Re: Models...

From: Magnus Lie Hetland <[email protected]>


> Samuele Pedroni <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > > but we already have aggregates that does not have a clear cut
> > > > semantics.
> > >
> > > Oh? Which ones?
> >
> > what I was referring to is that for:
> >
> > t=(0,0,200,200)
> > comp.geometry = t
> >
> > comp.geometry is t is false.
>
> Right. I think, however, that the semantics are clear cut. These are
> aliases, not proper attributes.
>

fair enough :). In the end I think my point was that just a subset of attrs for
comp.attr behave as "proper" attributes at the cost of introducing mutable
numbers and the modify idiom.





-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf