Re: PicoGUI backend

Lalo Martins <[email protected]>:
>
> I have the PicoGUI (http://picogui.org/) halfway trough. Should I post it to
> the list or what?

Sure :)

> It doesn't have layouts yet (because PicoGUI has a rather unconventional
> idea about layouts, so I will have to dedicate some design to this) and the
> only properties implemented are the ones where PicoGUI and Anygui use the
> same name, plus enabled and title; still, most tests display reasonably.
> 
> Some black magic was used to make the code simpler (yes, this phrase does
> make sense ;-) trust me), so I would appreciate some review by people who
> know Anygui's insides better - I have a nagging feeling I'm duplicating
> functionality.

Yeah... When we have things in place more solidly, we have to clarify
exactly what must be put in each back-end etc.

> (Oh, and there is also the rather silly problem that I don't know if I name
> it picogui.py or picoguigui.py or even pguigui...)

Hehe. Indeed... Even though it's slightly inconsistent, I think
picogui.py sounds best. (Perhaps we can be justified in calling the
original toolkit "pico"? ;)

> []s,
>                                                |alo
>                                                +----

-- 
Magnus Lie Hetland        Practical Python          The Anygui Project
http://hetland.org        http://ppython.com        http://anygui.org


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf