Re: Re: Have you looked at UIML?

"Joseph A. Knapka" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.anygui.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Gerald Bauer wrote:
> 
> > I read the post about XUL and a thought occurred!
> > Have anyone looked
> > at UIML?
> 
>   Yes, I looked at UIML. It's a dead end and a piece
> of junk.

I hope you don't expect the world to take your word
for it.

> > I'm not an expert on GUI and XML and such but what I
> > have read so far,
> > I think that UIML is more related to the goals of
> > anygui than XUL.
> 
>   You're kidding. XUL has the backing of major engines
> (Mozilla, Luxor, etc.) and books are hitting the
> shelfs as we speak. UIML has no industry backing
> whatsoever (well deserved) and UIML is way too complex
> and abstract to be useful.

Whatever. There's no reason in the world Anygui can't
support both, as long as someone is willing to write
the code.

[scissors of brevity]

Cheers,

-- Joe
  "I'd rather chew my leg off than maintain Java code, which
   sucks, 'cause I have a lot of Java code to maintain and
   the leg surgery is starting to get expensive." - Me


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.