Re: Re: Have you looked at UIML?
"Joseph A. Knapka" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.anygui.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Gerald Bauer wrote: > > > I read the post about XUL and a thought occurred! > > Have anyone looked > > at UIML? > > Yes, I looked at UIML. It's a dead end and a piece > of junk. I hope you don't expect the world to take your word for it. > > I'm not an expert on GUI and XML and such but what I > > have read so far, > > I think that UIML is more related to the goals of > > anygui than XUL. > > You're kidding. XUL has the backing of major engines > (Mozilla, Luxor, etc.) and books are hitting the > shelfs as we speak. UIML has no industry backing > whatsoever (well deserved) and UIML is way too complex > and abstract to be useful. Whatever. There's no reason in the world Anygui can't support both, as long as someone is willing to write the code. [scissors of brevity] Cheers, -- Joe "I'd rather chew my leg off than maintain Java code, which sucks, 'cause I have a lot of Java code to maintain and the leg surgery is starting to get expensive." - Me ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390