Re: The Taskmaker Returneth
"Samuele Pedroni" <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Oct 2002 03:25:40 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.anygui.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <006a01c27320$a4693060$6d94fea9@newmexico> |
From: "Magnus Lie Hetland" <[email protected]> > Anyway: It seems that we have an implementation of this stuff that > works. The alternative would be a very simple solution (event-based) I > think, so no matter what the outcome is, work on this area needn't be > a high priority. Making the rest work, and implementing the new > components (including menus) is IMO far more important. yes, although what we decide can influence the kind of optimizations we can do/make sense. I have fixed test_wrapper, btw it is backend indipendent, maybe that should be noted and it should be in a different table in status.txt . I have also fixed javagui wrt to test_shake. Discovering the obvious, i.e. that a correct implementation of setX,setY,setHeight,setWidth is mandatory for all components. While setPosition, setSize and setGeometry are only there for optimization. regards. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf