Re: The Taskmaker Returneth

"Samuele Pedroni" <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Oct 2002 03:25:40 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.anygui.devel
Message-ID <006a01c27320$a4693060$6d94fea9@newmexico>
From: "Magnus Lie Hetland" <[email protected]>
> Anyway: It seems that we have an implementation of this stuff that
> works. The alternative would be a very simple solution (event-based) I
> think, so no matter what the outcome is, work on this area needn't be
> a high priority. Making the rest work, and implementing the new
> components (including menus) is IMO far more important.

yes, although what we decide can influence the kind of optimizations we can
do/make sense.

I have fixed test_wrapper, btw it is backend indipendent, maybe that should be
noted
and it should be in a different table in status.txt .

I have also fixed javagui wrt to test_shake.

Discovering the obvious, i.e. that a correct implementation of
setX,setY,setHeight,setWidth is mandatory for all components.
While setPosition, setSize and setGeometry are only there for optimization.

regards.



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf