Interim release?
Magnus Lie Hetland <[email protected]> Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:23:18 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.anygui.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
What the heck -- why don't we just release? So things don't work perfectly... But if we can recommend that people try out the CVS version, why not give it to them as a release, available through the standard download channels at SourceForge and so forth? It might even induce a few more people to have a look and report bugs they find... In any case, it doesn't cost us (or me) much. In order to avoid getting this mixed up with planned releases, I suggest we call it an "interim release" (possibly the first of several) and number it with the release date, e.g. Anygui interim release 20040410 (or anygui-20040410.tar.gz). The release notes would be quite clear about the nature of the release, of course. By making rpms and Windows binary installers and the like, this would at least make the code more available for fooling around :) What do you think? -- Magnus Lie Hetland "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay http://hetland.org to live in the land of the free." -- C. M. Burns ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click