Re: Preparing for Biopython 1.67
Peter Cock <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.bio.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKVJ-_4vV1JC8XrsANS7fu9_Q2PyNVVWvZxAMDBVvAacNTWzbw@mail.gmail.com> |
This is live on PyPI now: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/biopython/ If anyone could test that now for any last minute issues, please do so. I still need to do the Windows installers and our own download page, then the release announcement for emailing and the OBF blog. Peter On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Peter Cock <[email protected]> wrote: > Another update, I've sorted out most of the warnings from the > test suite, although there are some open issues here: > > https://github.com/biopython/biopython/issues/838 > https://github.com/biopython/biopython/issues/845 > > For reasons unknown, the BioSQL SQLite tests are now regularly > failing under Python 2.6 on my old Windows XP machine, e.g. > > http://testing.open-bio.org/biopython/builders/Windows%20XP%20-%20Python%202.6/builds/657/steps/shell/logs/stdio > > This turned out to be unrelated to the recent minor changes to > how the BioSQL tests are configured - even a clean re-install of > Biopython 1.66 fails - and is frustratingly random. I'm giving up > on this - there is probably a handle leak somewhere but since > this seems to be Python 2.6 specific so it does not seem to be > that important. > > I'm going to try to do the release this afternoon - so please > don't commit anything to the master branch for the time > being. > > Thanks, > > Peter > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Peter Cock <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello again, >> >> That time plan failed due to the sudden need to do the website migration. >> >> However, if you've been watching the commits on GitHub you might >> have guessed from things like cleaning up the warnings from the test >> suite, recently I've been focusing on getting ready for Biopython 1.67. >> >> It may be tempting fate, but I hope to do the release next week - >> and in the process update the instructions where needed due to >> the website move to GitHub pages: >> >> http://biopython.org/wiki/Building_a_release >> >> On a related note, does anyone have any thoughts on how we >> have been tagging the releases so far in git? i.e. annotated tags >> versus the currently used "lightweight tags", see: >> >> https://github.com/biopython/biopython.github.io/issues/56 >> >> Thanks, >> >> Peter