Re: Bio.motifs.matrix.PositionSpecificScoringMatrix.calculate - scoring ambiguous sequences

Peter Cock <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.bio.devel
Message-ID <CAKVJ-_75BNaFZC+dEkoRsfYKmAB1yY4MX0bRwKaSwAcCUHsNWw@mail.gmail.com>
What do you think Michiel?

Also related, earlier today I filed this issue:
https://github.com/biopython/biopython/issues/851

Peter

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Sefa Kilic <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have been using the Bio.motifs PSSM search for a long time. Occasionally,
> I work with genome sequences containing ambiguous bases. Biopython currently
> does not support scoring sequences with ambiguous bases and I would like to
> propose a change to fix that.
>
> Currently, the "calculate" function in PositionSpecificScoringMatrix class
> checks if alphabets of both motif and sequence are
> IUPAC.IUPACUnambiguousDNA. If they are not, a ValueError exception is
> raised.
>
> The code itself, however, tolerates ambiguous bases on the sequence as NaN.
> That is, given a PSSM of length L, all L-mer subsequences of the given
> sequence are scored as NaN. I would like to extend it and do the scoring
> properly for ambiguous sequences. For instance, if the base is Y (C or T),
> it should be scored as the average of scoring it as C and as T. If the base
> is N, it should be scored as the average of all bases [S(A) + S(T) + S(C) +
> S(G)] / 4.
>
> The change needs to be done on both Python and C (_pwm.c) sides. What do you
> think? If you agree, I can implement it and send a pull request.
>
> Cheers,
>
> _______________________________________________
> Biopython-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.