Re: Sensible GitHub Issue Labels
Travis Wrightsman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.bio.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJ8Ascan68DJfqZVq3W5dfW=OsenD+V3ACZ5uH2oesxyouaUUA@mail.gmail.com> |
All the suggestions sound good to me. Travis On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Peter Cock <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Travis Wrightsman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I think a label like "Needs-Decision" is good for fixes that >> > have been made but need permission to move forward >> > (or maybe this can be handled just through pull requests). >> >> > If I have understood you, that that would just be a pull request. > > > >> Also, a label can be created for issues relating to non-bug, >> > non-enhancement things like PEP8 compliance and external >> > service configuration (Tox/Travis/CodeCoverage). I don't >> > know what to call such a label. >> >> > Maybe PEP8 or Style for that (also PEP257 for docstrings), and > Testing (covering Tox/Travis/CodeCoverage improvements etc)? > But initially I'd probably just put all of that under Enhancement. > > Peter > > -- Travis Wrightsman University of California, Riverside _______________________________________________ Biopython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython-dev