Re: Adopting BSD 3-Clause license for Biopython?
Peter Cock <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Aug 2016 14:35:35 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.bio.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKVJ-_4ZB=uWWPUvAsf5Seoxyw=zasp9DDWgbGAJWr_7MdoO3g@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Peter Cock <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Peter Cock <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Peter Cock <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hello all, >>> >>> Chatting with Christian in Orlando and the discussions for the >>> BOSC 2016 talk he gave for the Biopython Project Updates >>> reminded me about this long running licensing issue. >>> >>> I have opened a GitHub issue on this, and how I think we need >>> to move forward (includes links to older parts of this thread): >>> >>> https://github.com/biopython/biopython/issues/898 >>> >>> I have tried contacting the OSI via their online form, but suspect >>> this is not something they can help with directly: >>> >>> https://opensource.org/contact >> >> Auto reply suggesting: >> >>>> If the FAQ does not answer your question, please contact >>>> [email protected]. (Note that messages >>>> sent to this address will be viewed and answered by the >>>> public at large.) >> >> That's probably worth a try tomorrow... Richard Fontana (Board Director, Open Source Initiative) replied. Although not legal advice, his said that as a matter of law and/or community norms, switching licence would require permission of the original contributors - unless the original license allows for this (and ours does not explicitly). > In the mean time, we've made contact with the Software Freedom > Law Centre (SFLC, http://softwarefreedom.org) via Software in > the Public Interest, Inc. (SPI, http://spi-inc.org) which is the > umbrella organisation the Open Bioinformatics Foundation > (OBF) is part of for holding our financial assets. SFLC have replied to the initial inquiry, but I have yet to receive an answer about our specific question. Peter