Re: Biopython 1.68 plans (mid August?)
Peter Cock <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:15:36 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.bio.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKVJ-_4SKWThbQzZ143T5dzXfJc5r=RRWNXq4ySTbt1uyLmeTg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Lluís Revilla <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > I ran python2.7 setup.py test and all the test passed or where skipped as > expected. However here are outputs I found strange: > That's helpful, thank you! > running test > Python version: 2.7.6 (default, Jun 22 2015, 17:58:13) > [GCC 4.8.2] > Operating system: posix linux2 > ... > test_GenomeDiagram ... Warn: Can't find .pfb for face 'Times-Roman' > ok > test_GraphicsBitmaps ... skipping. Check the fonts needed by ReportLab if > you want bitmaps from Bio.Graphics > Can't setFont(Times-Roman) missing the T1 files? > Originally <type 'exceptions.TypeError'>: makeT1Font() argument 2 must be > string, not None I've seen this before - something odd going on with ReportLab. It might cause you problems with using GenomeDiagram, but otherwise don't worry about it. > ... > test_PAML_baseml ... > Error: Number of sequences different in tree and seq files.. > ok > test_PAML_codeml ... > Error: Number of sequences different in tree and seq files.. > ok That is strange. My guess is you have a different version of PAML installed to us, and somehow it gives odd output. Can you see what version you have for baseml and codeml? > ... > test_SeqIO_PdbIO ... > /home/lluis/Downloads/biopython-1.68/build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7/Bio/SeqIO/PdbIO.py:187: > BiopythonWarning: First line is not a 'HEADER'; can't determine PDB ID. > Line: 'TITLE STRUCTURE OF THE COMPLEX OF LAC REPRESSOR HEADPIECE AND > AN\n' > "Line: %r" % firstline, BiopythonWarning) > /home/lluis/Downloads/biopython-1.68/build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7/Bio/SeqIO/PdbIO.py:187: > BiopythonWarning: First line is not a 'HEADER'; can't determine PDB ID. > Line: 'REMARK INTRODUCED BUGS IN RESIDUES 2,3,4 AND WAT 67\n' > "Line: %r" % firstline, BiopythonWarning) > ok Probably harmless warning, there's an open issue on this: https://github.com/biopython/biopython/issues/838 > All the rest seems ok and I could import it correctly on python2.7. I could > test it for 3.4 too if no one can. > > Lluís That should be fine - thank you. Any tests of the Windows installers would he helpful though... Peter _______________________________________________ Biopython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython-dev