CI for Windows
Shyam Saladi <[email protected]> Sat, 19 Nov 2016 13:24:39 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.bio.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAARX5cWimaXhm4gtB8ubm0HM-H1+qYqPRL9XT6Bejc3duDPMhw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi all -- Is there any interest in setting up continuous integration testing for Windows? I recently did this for another, perhaps toy, software package using AppVeyor and would be willing to try my hand with biopython. Thanks, Shyam On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Peter Cock <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mahesh, > > Saying hello on this mailing list is very appropriate. Welcome! > > Right now we've been busy with rebuilding the website using > GitHub pages - you've found the repository for that - have a > look at the issue tracker or just looking glitches in the website > would be a good way to immediately help out. > > (If this side of things happens to particularly interest you, > then the websites for BioSQL, BioJava, and BioPerl have > been though a similar migration - I'm currently doing BioDAS > and there are a couple more to look at after that). > > On the testing side, Tiago has been looking at making it easier > for us to make sure we're testing all our code with "soft" or > optional dependencies. We're using TravisCI but haven't yet > got that working under Mac OS X too - nor have we setup a > similar system for Windows testing but such things exist. > > We do have a buildbot setup as well, testing.open-bio.org, > but do need another volunteer with a Windows machine... > > API documentation wise, we're still using epydoc to build > the API doc webpages from our docstrings, see: > > http://biopython.org/wiki/Building_a_release > > All our docstrings *should* now be valid restructured text. > A next step would be to replac epydoc (and its ugly HTML > output) with something like Sphinx, pandoc, or the hosted > service readthedocs.org > > Rather than scaring you (and anyone else reading this), I'm > trying to say there's lots of things that can be worked on > even without working directly on the code itself - so I hope > there's something that looks interesting that you'll try. > > And please do ask questions, > > Thanks! > > Peter > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Mahesh Gudapakkam > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I have a feeling this may not be the right way to offer that I'd like to > > help with contributing to Biopython but I am doing so per this text on > your > > website. (http://biopython.org/DIST/docs/tutorial/Tutorial.html#htoc319 > - > > The best place to express an interest is on the Biopython mailing lists > – > > just let us know you are interested in coding and what kind of stuff you > > want to work on.) > > > > I am Web developer and UI/UX designer who is very interested in > > Bioinformatics. Ideally I'd like to contribute to modules within > Biopython > > but I know that will take time and domain expertise. I will get there. > > > > However, I'd like to begin immediately by offering to help with the > website, > > documentation and unit tests. At present, I am reviewing both Chapter 22 > > Where to go from here – contributing to Biopython as well as your github > > repo for your website https://github.com/biopython/biopython.github.io. > > > > Please let me know if this is the right way to get involved with this > > effort. My apologies if I did this the wrong way. > > > > Thanks > > Mahesh Gudapakkam > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Biopython-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Biopython-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython-dev _______________________________________________ Biopython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython-dev