Re: Adding translate to the SeqRecord
Peter Cock <[email protected]> Fri, 26 May 2017 12:51:24 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.bio.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKVJ-_6KbMhwdPd25Wq-V0ohuKsQVfVn5E1LRUyNy+8jgKWk9Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Hello again, Sadly no comments about the proposed SeqRecord translate method here or github - I've mentioned the idea to a few people in person who were positive in principle: https://github.com/biopython/biopython/pull/1144 I'm inclined to take this as no objections, and will merge it next week... Peter On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Peter Cock <[email protected]> wrote: > Fellow Biopythoneers, > > I'd welcome comments on the idea of adding a translate method > to the SeqRecord object, > > https://github.com/biopython/biopython/issues/1103 > > This case up in some training material where for the flow of the > example, we wanted to parse FASTA nucleotides and create a > translated FASTA protein sequence file. > > Also comments on the proposed implementation (eg defaults > and argument order) here please: > > https://github.com/biopython/biopython/pull/1144 > > (If this is merged, since we have a reverse_complement, it would > make sense to include the (back)transcribe methods too for > completeness - here all the annotation could be copies, although > I'm not sure what the defaults ought best to be. > > Thanks, > > Peter