Re: Ideas for Biopython 2.0

On 21 June 2017 at 09:32, Peter Cock <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> By this do you mean agreeing a new scheme for where to put things,
> or the related but even harder challenge of how to allow sub-module
> installation under the Biopython namespace using actual sub-packages
> on PyPI? [*]. If anyone knows of a Python based effort like this, that
> would be really helpful for the practical details.
>
>
The latter, no doubt. It is mostly a technical challenge. Well done would
be amazing, poorly executed will be biting us in the rear forever.

The other potential serious problem would be how much code is shared
between 1 and 2.

I actually do not have opinions about the previous two points (maybe
because I find them hard), but I believe all the rest is easier.

If no one opposes, I would like to open a page on the wiki about this. Just
as a place to put ideas, so that they will not be forgotten.


-- 
Tiago Antao
Scientific and HPC programmer
http://tiago.org
https://github.com/tiagoantao/

_______________________________________________
Biopython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython-dev