Re: GA package recommendation.
Peter Cock <[email protected]> Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:31:38 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.bio.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKVJ-_5aY_j6Zf+2Pm6W-8Z69D5_14yNrAg2DdgwoaiKoOTraA@mail.gmail.com> |
Thanks Adil, RE: http://mailman.open-bio.org/pipermail/biopython-dev/2017-June/021780.html So lets deprecated Bio.GA and suggest DEAP as an alternative. Adil: Would you like to do this? You can follow my pull request for deprecating Bio.NeuralNetwork as an example: https://github.com/biopython/biopython/pull/1292 Peter On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Adil Iqbal <[email protected]> wrote: > The only other viable alternative is PyEasyGA, but I would not recommend > that to others. Because, (though it is, technically, full-featured) it's > last commit is almost a year ago, whereas DEAP's last commit was 5 days ago. > > For that reason, I would recommend DEAP. > > Best, > Adil > > _______________________________________________ > Biopython-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython-dev