Re: Changing the Biopython Logo
Peter Cock <[email protected]> Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:26:04 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.bio.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKVJ-_44P3WSztMOOeofZKxTbS+iyo2cKWk+=Eb98r2KsbghvA@mail.gmail.com> |
I forgot to write back on Friday - there was a longer than expected delay to get the WordPress emails via the mailman mailing list - but it worked. The Gravatar is now showing the new logo, and this is used on AppVeyor which is why I was looking at this: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/biopython/biopython/history Peter On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Peter Cock <[email protected]> wrote: > I've run into a glitch updating the Gravatar to the new logo, > which as you can see, it is currently still our old logo: > > https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/e17c48d1ab6c19cc203ad82d691e3806?s=200 > > That is the MD5 of the mailman biopython-dev-owner > address, but I don't recall the password I used to register it, > and the emails from WordPress to reset it are (currently) > not reaching us. > > Peter > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Peter Cock <[email protected]> wrote: >> Dear Biopythoneers, >> >> No one has raised any objections, so after 14 years of usage >> we will transition away from the DNA structure inspired two >> yellow snake double helix logo by Henrik Vestergaard and >> Thomas Hamelryck - and adopt the new blue and yellow >> snake double helix logo contributed by Patrick Kunzmann. >> >> http://biopython.org/wiki/Logo >> https://github.com/biopython/biopython.github.io/pull/116 >> >> I will always have a soft spot for the old logo, which was >> introduced shortly before I first started using Biopython, but >> am looking forward to seeing the new logo being adopted. >> >> Thank you Henrik, Thomas, and Patrick, >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Peter >> >> >> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Peter Cock <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Dear Biopythoneers, >>> >>> In case you were not aware, Patrick Kunzmann has created a >>> new logo for Biopython, and based on the positive feedback >>> I am proposing we adopt it at the end of next week. >>> >>> See email below sent to the main mailing lists (with a different title), >>> resending here also including the low volume biopython-announce >>> mailing list as well. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Peter Cock <[email protected]> >>> Date: Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:54 PM >>> Subject: Re: [Biopython] Suggestion for a new biopython logo >>> To: Patrick Kunzmann <[email protected]> >>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Biopython-Dev >>> Mailing List <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> To recap for those not following the GitHub issue [1], based on >>> the voting there was a clear preference for a monotone yellow and >>> blue version of Patrick's logo using an overhead view of the snake >>> heads with blunt nose and no tongue. >>> >>> We have confirmed with the Python Software Foundation (PSF) >>> that they have no trademark concerns since the current Python >>> logo is also a yellow and blue snake [2]. >>> >>> If there are no objections here on the mailing list or on the GitHub >>> issue, I propose we adopt the new logo at the end of next week >>> (i.e. Friday 9 June). >>> >>> As a curtesy, I will forward this email directly to past major >>> contributors including the named authors of the 2009 publication, >>> in case they have missed these discussions. >>> >>> Thank you all - especially Patrick for coming up with a stylish fresh >>> new take on our classic logo (and for getting involved on the code >>> side of Biopython as well). >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/biopython/biopython.github.io/pull/116 >>> [2] http://mailman.open-bio.org/pipermail/biopython-dev/2017-May/021703.html >>> and https://github.com/biopython/biopython.github.io/pull/116#issuecomment-303666735