Re: Biopython 1.70 plans
Peter Cock <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Jul 2017 18:39:50 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.bio.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKVJ-_6NFOm6T5tM=KBAnyBfj_Cz6Z5_A52QovBxiJ8ZDnFonw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hello all, Michael & Adil: Those deprecations are now done, thanks: https://github.com/biopython/biopython/pull/1292 https://github.com/biopython/biopython/pull/1303 Given a recent pip/numpy query, I'd like someone to review at a further change to setup.py regarding our NumPy dependency: https://github.com/biopython/biopython/pull/1307 This would make NumPy a hard requirement (except on Jython which we plan to drop, and IronPython which as far as I know has not been tested with Biopython for quite some time and is even less important). This would also switch from requirements.txt to putting the dependency in setup.py (since we now use setuptools in place of distutils). Otherwise I think we're about ready for Biopython 1.70 (there are a few nearly ready pull requests which might make it in as well), which I'd like to try to do this week. Peter On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Michiel de Hoon <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Otherwise, I don't think there is anything worth delaying the > > >> > release for. >> >> We could include deprecating Bio.NeutralNetwork and Bio.GA >> as well: >> >> https://github.com/biopython/biopython/pull/1292 >> >> http://mailman.open-bio.org/pipermail/biopython-dev/2017-June/021780.html >> http://mailman.open-bio.org/pipermail/biopython-dev/2017-June/021783.html > > Yes let's do that. It will help to clean up the code base. > > Best, > -Michiel