Re: [Biopython] Biopython Enhancement Proposal (BEP): Alphabets

Dear all,

BioPython is now looking for someone new to take over the project in the 
email below. If anyone is interested, please do let Michiel or me know. 
It's a great opportunity to be involved in the future of BioPython!

All the best,
Thomas

On 2018-08-04 03:04, Michiel de Hoon wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> While sequence objects in Biopython have an associated alphabet, the
> purpose of alphabets in Biopython is currently not well-defined.
> I can imagine these three interpretations of their purpose:
> 
> 	* To define how the sequence data is stored internally in a Seq
> object (i.e. what kind of objects are in seq.data);
> 	* To define conceptually what the Seq object contains (e.g. this is a
> protein, or this is DNA, or this is DNA with or without methylation);
> 	* To define how a Seq object should be presented to the user (e.g. as
> a single-letter string, a three-letter string, or something else).
> 
> (and there may be others that I have overlooked).
> 
> To justify having alphabets as a part of Biopython, their purpose
> should be clearly defined.
> 
> Because of the complexity of alphabets and their use in Biopython, we
> felt that it may be a good idea to have a PEP (Python Enhancement
> Proposal)-like discussion to define the purpose of alphabets and their
> technical implementation in Biopython. This would mean that somebody
> who is in favor of having alphabets in Biopython would work out a
> proposal with all the details to allow developers and users to think
> through the implications.
> 
> Here you can find a description of PEPs and what should go in them:
> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001/ [1]
> 
> Not all of it is applicable to Biopython, but it may serve as a
> general guideline.
> 
> The Alphabet BEP (Biopython Enhancement Proposal) could be hosted on
> the Biopython website so that everybody can follow the discussion.
> 
> Since alphabets have been under discussion for more than 10 years, we
> are thinking to put a time limit to the proposal (e.g., until January
> 1st, 2020), meaning that if no agreement on the proposal is reached by
> then, alphabets would be removed from Biopython. This would give
> people who are in favor of alphabets to make their case, while
> guaranteeing that a conclusion will be reached (either a well-defined
> and usable alphabet, or no alphabet) within the next ~1.5 years.
> 
> Any volunteers? Seq objects and therefore their alphabets are a key
> feature of Biopython, and working through a BEP can give you the
> opportunity to help design a major part of Biopython.
> 
> Best,
> -Michiel
> 
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Biopython mailing list  -  [email protected]
> http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython
_______________________________________________
Biopython mailing list  -  [email protected]
http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython