Re: [Biopython] BioPython Bio.motifs module dual license agreement

Peter Cock <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.bio.general
Message-ID <CAKVJ-_6BQv0AuaHPnh+PVyGRzT4kx3jRpKOcqvZ7fUhNRp=Nkw@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Bartek,

We've not yet tagged all the files in Biopython as dual licensed
(and the tests are particularly lagging), so I can see why Gert
wanted to double check.

Peter

On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 5:01 PM Bartek Wilczynski <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Sure, no problem. I actually did give my permission for dual-licensing of my code, which I assumed covered any such "re-introduction of the code", but if my approval is needed, again - here it is.
> best regards
> Bartek
>
> On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 5:31 PM Gert Hulselmans <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bartek,
>>
>> Could you take a look at: https://github.com/biopython/biopython/pull/1453
>> which adds support for parsing various motif formats?
>>
>> As some code is based on your code (Tests/test_motifs.py) and BioPython's license changed,
>> they want your permission for re-licensing the code: https://github.com/biopython/biopython/issues/898
>>
>> It would be great if you allow them to re-license your BIopython contributions,
>> so my patch can be finally merged after 4 years.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Gert Hulselmans
>
>
>
> --
> Bartek Wilczynski
> ==================
> Institute of Informatics
> University of Warsaw
> http://www.mimuw.edu.pl/~bartek
_______________________________________________
Biopython mailing list  -  [email protected]
https://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.