Re: [Biopython] Dropping Python 3.5 support?
Peter Cock <[email protected]> Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:13:27 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.bio.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKVJ-_7TQOtkSoMWrNpf641Xm442o67JYmb=LMs+h56DWxrVhw@mail.gmail.com> |
If you mean we should aim to release Biopython 1.76 as the final release with Python 2.7 support in mid/late December 2019 (rather than early January 2020 which is what I was thinking), I wouldn't object. Any thoughts on Python 3.5 support? Peter On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 2:59 PM Michiel de Hoon <[email protected]> wrote: > > >To start the conversation going, I would like to suggest we drop Python 3.5 > support at the same time that we drop Python 2.7 (after our first release in > 2020). > > Let's drop Python 2.7 already in our first release in 2020, so that all releases from 2020 are Python3 only. > > Best, > -Michiel > > > On Monday, November 18, 2019, 10:33:55 PM GMT+9, Peter Cock <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear Biopythoneers, > > We have already announced that we are dropping Python 2.7 support in > early 2020, which will leave us supporting Python 3.5, 3.6, 3.7 and 3.8. > > Both Python 3.5 and 3.6 are no longer getting bug fixes, only security > fixes though to September 2020 and December 2021 respectively > (based on a five year life cycle): > > https://devguide.python.org/#status-of-python-branches > > As usual, the motivation is both reducing the number of combinations we > must test on, and being able to take advantage of language improvements. > In this case we would be able to assume sorted dictionaries (a language > feature guaranteed in Python 3.7 onwards, but actually implemented in > C Python 3.6 and PyPy so effectively available in Python 3.6 onwards). > > In similar past discussion the only real obstacle to dropping support for > older Python versions has been when a widely used Linux system had > it as the default system Python - although nowadays with conda etc it > is very easy to ignore that in favour of a user-specific Python setup. > > Are any of our mailing list subscribers still using Python 3.5? If so, > would having to update be a major hurdle? > > To start the conversation going, I would like to suggest we drop Python 3.5 > support at the same time that we drop Python 2.7 (after our first release in > 2020). > > Peter > _______________________________________________ > Biopython mailing list - [email protected] > https://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython _______________________________________________ Biopython mailing list - [email protected] https://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython