Re: [Biopython] Biopython 1.77 plans
Peter Cock <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jan 2020 22:02:43 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.bio.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKVJ-_5RazuDQFa_Drvd2DFJUz-fr7rmaUh7Jz_X8xkMDjagKg@mail.gmail.com> |
Excellent - the Python 2/3 cleanup work doesn't seem to have stopped yet anyway ;) Peter On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 6:16 PM rob miller <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm expecting 2-3 more days before I can pass this back to João for review. > Cheers, > Rob. > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 2:21 AM João Rodrigues < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes. I'd say go for the release and if they are ready or near-ready by >> then, we include them. Just wanted to mention them since it's been quite a >> lot of work on Rob's part to integrate his work in Biopython. >> >> Peter Cock <[email protected]> escreveu no dia quarta, >> 29/01/2020 à(s) 15:08: >> >>> You mean these? >>> >>> https://github.com/biopython/biopython/pull/2399 >>> https://github.com/biopython/biopython/pull/2400 >>> >>> If they're ready soon, then sure. >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:01 PM João Rodrigues < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Peter, >>>> >>>> If there's time, it would be nice to merge Rob Miller's internal >>>> coordinate code, but we can also leave it for the next release otherwise. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> João >>>> >>>> Peter Cock <[email protected]> escreveu no dia quarta, >>>> 29/01/2020 à(s) 07:58: >>>> >>>>> Hello all, >>>>> >>>>> We have indeed done a *lot* of Python 2 cleanup over December and into >>>>> January 2020, and finished applying black to all of Biopython except >>>>> the >>>>> tests. >>>>> >>>>> There is still some more of this maintenance work on going, but I think >>>>> my proposal aiming to release the Python 3 only Biopython 1.77 in early >>>>> February 2020 is still sensible. >>>>> >>>>> Again, are there any new things people are working on, or important bug >>>>> fixes we should wait for? >>>>> >>>>> Thank you, >>>>> >>>>> Peter >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 4:14 PM Peter Cock <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear Biopytoneers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Biopython 1.76 released 20 December 2019 was our last release to >>>>>> support Python 2, although surprisingly the same day it was announced >>>>>> that Python 2.7 got a last minute support extension until April 2020: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.python.org/psf/press-release/pr20191220/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Since then we've been busy removing legacy code and workarounds needed >>>>>> for Python 2 in Biopython, focussed on supporting Python 3.6 or later >>>>>> only. At the current rate, we'll have finished the bulk of that work >>>>>> later this month. >>>>>> >>>>>> Another milestone in sight is adoption of the black style for our >>>>>> source code (although the tests will take a while longer). >>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/psf/black >>>>>> >>>>>> While neither of these goals in themselves adds any new functionality, >>>>>> I think that would be a good point to release Biopython 1.77 - perhaps >>>>>> early February 2020? >>>>>> >>>>>> Are there any other new things people are working on, or important bug >>>>>> fixes we should wait for? >>>>>> >>>>>> Peter >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Biopython mailing list - [email protected] >>>>> https://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> Biopython mailing list - [email protected] >> https://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython > > _______________________________________________ Biopython mailing list - [email protected] https://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython