Re: [Biopython] How many of you are on Slack?
Tiago Antão <[email protected]> Fri, 2 Jul 2021 13:04:37 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.bio.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAA9RGEONebi6qD3n5xTYYxOkQ1b17e5WY-aGsjOwARne20Mucg@mail.gmail.com> |
+1 for considering zulip Tiago On Thu, Jul 1, 2021, 7:02 AM Alister Burt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I don’t contribute to Biopython but I work on another open source project > which makes heavy use of a solution called Zulip. https://zulip.com/ > > There is some overhead, it’s self hosted, but we really love the > combination of instantaneous chat with the email threading model that it > provides. > > Best, > > Alister > > On 30 Jun 2021, at 23:16, Martin Mokrejs <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Dear all, > me too, although I have to use Slack for a project I don't like it. And > am on second slack channel to which which don't even login using a > different email address. I don't have time to follow all the notices, > sorry. If you wan to convert biopython-dev to Slack just do it, it affects > few people. It is at least clearer than IRC. While shutting down the email > list you will probably loose some readers. Myself I am not going to > re-register. I guess others who won't speak will also just disregard if > they stop receiving emails from the list. > > I am loosing track of biopython development as I did not migrate apps to > python3, did not switch away from matplotlib, well, do as you wish. I am > not actively contributing so my participation is not really relevant. If it > is time burden to maintain the virtuals running mailman etc., well, ... > > Best, > Martin > > > On 30/06/2021 23:38, Stéphane Téletchéa wrote: > > Dear all, > > I understand the arguments of all others, > > Le 28/06/2021 à 17:00, João Rodrigues a écrit : > > An email is "passive": you subscribe and that's it, gets delivered to your > inbox. It's also the lowest common denominator in terms of tech in the > sense that everyone has/uses email. > > > But yes, I'm probably more traditional, email is asynchronous and I like > that. > > Personally I really HATE slack, too disperse for my brain, I've worked > with it for one year and this was awful and very time consuming, > I'm also using regularly Mattermost and I also dislike it a lot. Students > say it is wonderful, but this was really because we were confined > that I had accepted to work like this (taking too much time to be > productive). > > Considering google groups, I also HATE it as google mail etc. I'm also > concerned about the > "we cut without delay this service as we don't want to run it anymore" > policy of Google that happened already on many of their past services. > > This is probably only me but I have a very well organised mail box with > many synchronised mails (sometimes on one computer, sometimes on another > one), > and that fits my needs. > > If you close the mailing list, then I'd follow, but the existing situation > is ok to me. > > Considering the overhead of running different systems, I completely > understand the need to leverage it, > but I'm not sure there are reliable long-term solutions really available. > > My 0.02 cents/pennies. > > Best, > > Stéphane > > > _______________________________________________ > Biopython mailing list - [email protected] > https://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython > > > _______________________________________________ > Biopython mailing list - [email protected] > https://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython > _______________________________________________ Biopython mailing list - [email protected] https://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython